At the same time the media have "responsibly" informed people of the location of a child sex offender in "the public interest" and effectively created a lynch mob of vigilantes to create public disorder until the offender moves somewhere else and the media can search for him all over again. All very laudable until they track down an innocent person who has the misfortune to share the same name as one of these paedophiles and the mob manage to lynch them, is this still "responsible" and "in the public interest"? Somehow I don't think so.
* Ripper Reference: On October 16th 1888 George Lusk, the president of the Whitechapel Vigilance Committee, received a three-inch-square cardboard box. Inside was half a human kidney preserved in wine, along with the following letter:
From Hell
Mr Lusk,
Sor
I send you half the Kidne I took from one woman and prasarved it for you tother piece I fried and ate it was very nise. I may send you the bloody knif that took it out if you only wate a whil longer
signed
Catch me when you can Mishter Lusk
No comments:
Post a Comment